ð€Â APPLICANT NAME
ðCV
â REVIEWER NAME
ðDate
<aside> â ð Guidelines for Use:
Remember, while rubrics are helpful for standardizing evaluations, they should be used as a guide rather than a strict rule. Interviewers should also consider qualitative aspects and overall impressions when making their final decisions.
</aside>
RUBRIC | SCORE |
---|---|
Expectations exceeded; Highest skill set evidenced; Very strong | 4 |
Expectations met; Strong skill set evidenced; Strong | 3 |
Guidelines met; Adequate skill set evidenced; Adequate | 2 |
Guidelines somewhat met; Inadequate skillset evidenced; Minimal / Limited | 1 |
Inadequate; Incomplete; Skill set not evidenced | 0 |
SCORING SCALE | TOTAL |
---|---|
EXCEPTIONAL | 25 â 28 |
STRONG CANDIDATE | 21 â 24 |
MEETS MINIMUM | 16 â 20 |
MINIMUM NOT MET | 0 â 15 |
<aside> â Candidate total score 23 - STRONG CANDIDATE
</aside>
CRITERIA | 4 (Very strong) | 3 (Strong) | 2 (Adequate) | 1 (Limited) | 0 (Not Present) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Professionalism and Communication Skills | Demonstrates exceptional professionalism and communication skills; clear, concise, and engaging. | Professional and articulate, with minor lapses in clarity or engagement. | Displays basic communication skills but lacks clarity or professionalism at times. | Limited professionalism or communication skills; struggles to express ideas clearly. | No professionalism or effective communication skills demonstrated. |
Problem-Solving Abilities and Critical Thinking | Exhibits outstanding problem-solving skills and critical thinking; provides innovative solutions. | Good problem-solving abilities; shows a solid level of critical thinking. | Displays basic problem-solving skills; some critical thinking evident. | Limited problem-solving skills; lacks depth in critical thinking. | Unable to demonstrate problem-solving or critical thinking skills. |
Teamwork and Collaboration | Exceptional ability to work in a team; demonstrates leadership and collaboration skills. | Works well in a team; shows good collaboration but may lack initiative. | Adequate team player; occasional difficulties in collaboration. | Struggles with teamwork; rarely collaborates effectively. | Does not display any ability to work in a team or collaborate. |
Adaptability and Flexibility | Highly adaptable and flexible; can manage unexpected situations with ease. | Generally adaptable and handles change well, with minor difficulties. | Shows some adaptability, but struggles with change or unexpected situations. | Limited ability to adapt; resistant to change. | Unable to adapt or be flexible in any situation. |
Industry Knowledge and Expertise | Demonstrates extensive industry knowledge and expertise. | Good understanding of the industry, with some areas of expertise. | Basic industry knowledge; lacks depth in certain areas. | Limited understanding of the industry and its key concepts. | No knowledge or understanding of the industry. |
Cultural Fit and Alignment with Company Values | Perfect alignment with company culture and values; demonstrates understanding and commitment. | Good fit with company culture and values; minor discrepancies noted. | Fair alignment with company culture; some misalignment with values. | Poor fit with company culture; noticeable differences in values. | Does not align with company culture or values at all. |
Technical Skills and Proficiency Relevant to the Position | Demonstrates superior technical skills; shows advanced proficiency in areas relevant to the role. | Good technical skills; proficient in most areas relevant to the position. | Adequate technical skills; basic proficiency in areas relevant to the job. | Limited technical skills; lacks proficiency in several key areas. | No technical skills or proficiency relevant to the position. |